In this paper, I will examine the horrific situation of
war and displacement in Southern Sudan. The region has been and continues
to be subjected to war and displacement since 1820 up to date. The paper
will also discuss the numerous attempts over the years to restore peace and
stability in this region. My main argument is that, this vicious cycle of
war, displacement was and continue to be perpetuated by other regional and
global factors, instead of the obvious reasons such as, cultural and religious
difference, ethnicity, power struggle to name but a few. These unpalatable
effects are what I call the symptoms of the war. My argument is that, unless
the people understand and tackle these regional and global factors, the tireless
attempts to settle and stabilize the situation in Southern Sudan may not
be successful.
Southern Sudan is the region in the Republic of Sudan that falls between
4 and 12 degrees parallel. It comprises of Bahr al Gazal, Equatoria and Upper
Nile states. The war and displacement in Southern Sudan, has caused disproportionate
deaths, destruction, political and tribal divisions, lost of properties and
dignity. The paper will first discuss the unpleasant effects of war on the
Southern Sudanese communities as was previously mentioned. Secondly, the
paper will examine the roles and initiatives these communities are undertaking
in order to make life meaningful to its members, despite the overwhelming
odds of war and displacement. Finally the paper will analyze the attempts
made by these communities, nation states, other NGO’s, regional, and the
international organizations in order to resolve the conflict in Southern
Sudan. The information used in this paper is based on interviews with refugees/displaced
Southern Sudanese in Winnipeg, Canada. Some of these people experience the
life of displacement more than once. The study was conducted between March1999
to August 2003.
The Need for a Free Press in the Post-War
Reconstruction Process in South Sudan
Brian Adeba
Independent Scholar
Canada
The history of the media in South Sudan as a tool for reconstruction
is one of missed opportunities. Introduced by the British colonials in the
fifties, the first newspaper available to South Sudanese was a public relations
tool designed to sell the concept of a united Sudan to Southerners. South
Sudanese did not participate in creating their own media because the colonials
were wary of other views that were not in line with their plans for Sudan.
After the Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972, the media that came into existence
was one controlled by the then autonomous government of the South. To a very
large extent then, the media was a government tool and freedom of expression
was limited.
But with the blowing of the so called “wind of change” that ushered in the
advent of multi-party democracy in Africa in the late 80s and early 90s,
(and with it, the introduction of media freedoms), South Sudanese today are
more conscious of the need for a free press than they were 30 years ago.
Coupled with this is the fact that there is a large South Sudanese Diaspora
in the West who are increasingly playing a vocal behind-the-scenes role on
how the South should be run.
Post-war reconstruction is increasingly becoming a broad definition that
includes the need for a free and viable press. Such a press would enlighten
the people of the South on a broad spectrum of issues including the need
to make and decide political choices.
A free press is therefore essential in fostering good governance, accountability
and democracy in the emerging South Sudan and should therefore be encouraged
in the post-war reconstruction process.