B. Yongo-Bure
Kettering University
The Machakos Protocol is the nucleus of the Sudan Peace Agreement signed
in Nairobi on January 9, 2005. The key points of the Machakos Protocol that
will have considerable impact on the future of Sudan are that: the unity
of Sudan is to be given priority by bringing about social, political, and
economic justice for all the people of Sudan; the establishment of a democratic
system of governance taking account of the cultural, ethnic, racial, religious,
and linguistic diversity and gender equality of the people of Sudan; the
people of Southern Sudan to govern their territory and participate equitably
in the National Government; and the people of Southern Sudan have right
to self-determination through a referendum in 2011.
The attainment of the above objectives and goals was to begin with the designing
of the peace agreement, through to the creation of the institutions and
mechanisms for the implementation of the agreement, and up to the implementation
of the agreement. This paper examines the consistency of the peace agreement
and the actions during the Pre-Interim period on the realization of the
goals of the Machakos Protocol. It also speculates on possible scenarios
during the Interim (implementation) Period that will probably influence
the outcome of the referendum on self-determination.
Beyond the Nation-State: Emerging
Issues Related to NGO Activities in Kajo Keji County
Beyond the Nation-State: Emerging Issues Related to NGO Activities in Kajo Keji County
Based on extensive analysis of organizational documents, correspondence and interviews in both Sudan and the Sudanese diaspora, this paper explores the role of NGOs in Kajo Keji County on Sudans southern border. It examines the extent to which NGOs have taken over the Countys education, health, rural development and water sectors. Two sets of conclusions are drawn. Firstly, both NGOs and the civil authorities they work with are overwhelmed by movements of refugees and IDPs; food security problems, inadequate infrastructures, accountability issues and other difficulties which have emerged as a result of decades of instability. Secondly, to avoid any disruption of essential services, authorities and institutions emerging from the peace process must build on the relationships established during the war, or at very least, avoid harming them. Based on evidence from individual accounts and press reports from elsewhere in southern Sudan, the author of this paper assumes that the issues facing Kajo Keji are applicable in other parts of Sudan and beyond.
Rebuilding War-Torn Societies: The
Case of Southern Sudan
Mom K Nhial Arou
Independent Scholar
Canada